Lesson 2, part 2

For the next part of this lesson, the following two projects are considered:-

Lucia Tkacova and Aneta Mona Chisa (2011) 80:20 Statement on the Romanian Pavillion walls in Venice Giardini for the Venice Biennale.

Dora García ‘100 Impossible Artworks’ (2001) (reproduced in a press release for a 2010 show at MUSAC Collection, León.)

Both works are text pieces and they have been presented in different ways in exhibitions. The first work, The Trivial Few, was painted on the external walls of the Romanian Pavilion as part of the official representation at Venice in a group exhibition. It has also been painted on pillars and presented as handwritten handouts on A4 sheets.
Dora Garcia’s work was an artist’s statement which has circulated as a press release, been realised in an exhibition as a text installation of propositions and presented in an exhibition for artworks that can never be realised.

Writing works not as the realization of fantasy worlds that require a suspension of disbelief, but rather toward the unmaking and remaking of them. Its role is, as it always was, both de- and reconstructive: neither negative nor affirmative. As a queer feminist praxis, writing reverses and displaces the gendered hierarchical dualism of naturalized entities like subjects and objects (Haraway 1991). Its strategic value is that of reinvention rather than mere substitution (her story never simply replaces his) and it constitutes, as an action, in its present participle, a way out of the dialecticism that precludes the possibility of doing iworlds differently.

Sarah Kember ‘Abstract’ for Chapter ‘iMedia Manifesto Part II: Tell a Her Story: On Writing as Queer Feminist Praxis’ in Sarah Kember iMedia: The Gendering of Objects, Environments and Smart Materials (Palgrave Pivot, London, 2016)      https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137374851_6

This quote from Sarah Kember summarises the complex nature of manifestos which require a suspension of disbelief but are not fantasy, nor are they simply affirming or negating things in the world.

Can we think of these artworks, in Kember’s terms, as “reinvention, rather than mere substitution”, and how are they “doing i(information) worlds differently”?

Lucia Tkacova and Aneta Mona Chisa (2011) The Trivial Few 80:20

The text used in this artwork is in the ebook and online.

Anetta Mona Chişa was born in Romania and Lucia Tkáčová was born in Slovakia. They are currently based in Berlin and Prague and have collaborated on projects since 2000.

The manifesto of the 80:20 was made into an artwork on the external walls of the Romanian Pavillion in the Giardini of the Venice Biennale.

If you follow the links to these websites, you can quickly find photographic imagery about this work:-

This is how Anetta Mona Chisa and Lucia Tkacova describe their rationale for making the work, in the first place. And it is significant in terms of the general picture of what they want to affirm and negate and what art in exhibitions should be.

‘We did it because we believe an exhibition shouldn’t be an artfair booth, an exercise book (a re-make of approved patterns), a boot camp, a shop window, a betting office, a mausoleum, for sale, a playground of control and domination, a storage room, a fashion victim, a job, obedient, a lodge of the golden lion, politically correct, a must. And, because we believe an exhibition should be a manifesto, a white spot on the map, an alchemistic formula, a battlefield, a collective orgasm (not a masturbation), a seedling of the unexpected, fearless, a work of art, a time-bomb, embracing the potential of own failure, a book of dreams, an arena of conflicts, a trojan horse in the world order, a prophetic hollow, a spectre of utopia.’

Hedling Turai: Seedling of the unexpected
In conversation with Anetta Mona Chisa and Lucia Tkacova (4 August 2011)
http://exindex.hu/index.php?l=en&page=3&id=814

At the heart of Anetta Mona Chisa and Lucia Tkacova’s collaboration lies their quest to find a means of reconciling the political with the aesthetic validity of art. How, Chisa and Tkacova ask, can art articulate resistance and stimulate social change without diminishing its aesthetic power or facilitating its instrumentalization? The duo has pursued this question across a range of media, including film, installation, textual work, drawing, performance, photography and sculpture.

http://artdaily.com/news/83191/Anetta-Mona-Chisa-and-Lucia-Tkacova-s–ah–soul-in-a-coma–act-naive–attack–opens-in-Bremen#.XLRyxqTTWbg  April 15, 2019

The underlying principle to the format of The Trivial Few (2007/08) is explained by their gallery’s press release.

In 1906 Vilfred Pareto, an Italian sociologist and economist, noticed that 80% of Italy’s wealth was owned by 20% of the population and the rest 80% of inhabitants shared the remaining 20% of resources. The Pareto principle (also known as the 80:20 rule) became an economical equation that reflects the uneven distribution of the global wealth. In 1937, Joseph M. Juran conceptualized the 80:20 principle and extended it to the rule of “the vital” few and the “trivial many”, claiming that 80% of the effects comes from 20% of the causes. Its universal application makes it one of the most useful concepts and tools of modern-day management.

Press Release of Christine Konig Galerie, 2009

This work speaks to the current spectacle of the art world’s commercial trading and it’s role as entertainment, fashion, prizes and accolades for a few, marketplace and for the accumulation of capital. The work they’ve made offers an alternative set of propositions for how art should intervene in this world.

What do you think about these ideas?

          Add your comments, reactions and thoughts to Lesson 2 forum

Dora García, 100 Impossible Artworks (paper version), 1995

The text for this work is in the ebook and online

Dora Garcia’s website: http://www.doragarcia.net/#

It was reproduced in a press release for a 2010 show at MUSAC Collection, León but has also taken several other forms in exhibitions.

100 Impossible Artworks is an artwork that consists of a list of impossible works of art. Although they cannot actually be created, the act of enumerating them and reflecting on them through another work of art (the list featured in this exhibition) paradoxically enables them to be produced, albeit in an altogether different form.

https://www.herzliyamuseum.co.il/en/exhibition/dora-garcia/

Dora García, 100 Impossible Artworks (paper version), 1995, unique piece

In The Impossible Artworks project I deal with impossibility, with actions whose interest lies in imagining them. On a more realistic plane, you do come across unfeasible projects, but not because they are impossible to make, but as a result of a lack of resources. I however tend to make cheap projects so that they are realisable.

Dora Garcia in an interview with Beatriz Escudero and Zaida Trallero (2015): http://site-specificconversation.com/en/dora-garcia-3/

More reading:-

http://tranzit.org/freeschool/interju/institutions-institutional-critique-and-the-public-chus-martinez-and-dora-garcia-interviewed-by-agnes-szanyi-2/?lang=en

Institutions, institutional critique and the public. Chus Martínez and Dora García Interviewed by Ágnes Szanyi 2015-02-12 | tranzit.hu


60 Seconds with the Artist: Dora García (Episode 1)
Biennale of Sydney (2008)

http://www.geifco.org/actionart/actionart03/secciones/1marca/artistas/EspacioALaLetra/dora_garcia/dora.htm

3 images of the installation as an exhibition display, 1999-2001

Dora Garcia’s website: http://www.doragarcia.net/#
gives information about many of her other larger projects, but not this one.

Coda: Feminist Precedents for text interventions

In their use of text for installations and as paper documents, both Dora Garcia and Tcakova and Chisa’s work bears comparison with Jenny Holzer’s Truisms series, started in 1977.

Janet Lyons in her book on Manifestos regards Jenny Holzer’s work as a prime example of a feminist manifesto as an artwork:

Jenny Holzer’s Truisms were originally arranged alphabetical as a list. She began the public showing of this work by pasting pieces of paper with different truisms on the streets, like “adverts” or broadsheets or a campagin. The piece was also presented in many different kinds of LED displays:- on Times Square electronic billboards and as installations using multiple LED strips, presented on staircases or as filling rooms in different museums. It has also been presented as large-scale light projections, as posters and in print formats.

The following quote, as well as presenting how the piece started, discusses the piece in terms of address: who is being addressed by this work? What is the voice or mandate being proclaimed?

Holzer began writing the “Truisms” while she was a student in the Whitney Museum of American Art’s Independent Study Program (ISP) in New York. Many of the phrases originated from what she described in a 1985 interview as a “self-help maneuver”: her attempt to boil down each book on the program’s notoriously rigorous reading list into a one-liner, a way to “convey knowledge with less pain.”2 Holzer also composed an equal number of statements expressing positions at ideological odds with those derived from the critical theory that dominated the ISP’s curriculum. “There’d be left-wing ones, there’d be right-wing ones, there would be loony ones, there’d be heartland ones,” Holzer explained of the mix of phrases.3 Holzer’s aim was egalitarian: to translate complex theories into plain language. By giving each statement equal visual treatment and presenting them anonymously, she seemed to offer no judgment, instead inviting readers themselves to evaluate the ideas conveyed in this accessible, succinct way.

Leah Pires ‘Issues & Commentary: Truisms and Lies’ Art in America magazine Oct 1, 2018 https://www.artinamericamagazine.com/news-features/magazines/issues-commentary-truisms-lies/#fn2

Truisms is neither a long-form poem nor is it a novel. What does this collection of statements amount to? Many of its statements have been remade into posters, t-shirts, projections, as well as LED displays in different formats, scales and sizes.

As a collection, the ambiguity of who is being addressed and from what particular perspective is part of the appeal of the piece. Holzer herself suggested that developing this kind of anonymity was a means of fostering multiplicity, so that the statements could not be attributed to the 20-something female that she was in 1977.

How do Dora Garcia’s and Tkacova and Chisa’s works play with ambiguity in terms of address?

Do they gain strength because we can read them as “the artists’ voice?”

Click to continue lesson

Part 1……Part 3

Click to continue lesson

Part 1……Part 3

Summary

In this lesson, we are going to look at:-

Part 1

Ewa Partum

Change, My Problem is a Problem of a Woman (1979)

_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Agnes Denes

Manifesto (1970)

______________________________________________
Part 2

Lucia Tkacova and Aneta Mona Chisa

80:20 (2011)

_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Dora García

100 Impossible Artworks (2001)

_____________________________________________
Part 3

Lily Bea Moor (aka Senga Nengudi)

Lilies of the Valley, Unite! or NOT (1998)

_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Rhani Lee Remedes

SCUB Manifesto (2002)

_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Silvia Ziranek

Manifesta! (2013)

_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Fabrika Nadyonii Odezhdii, FNO (The Factory of Found Clothes)
Natalya Pershina-Yakimanskaya and Olga Egorova, (Gluklya and Tsaplya)

Manifesto of Factory of Found Clothes (1995)

top
Copyright © KT press